<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Response!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://auldlangsyne24.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://auldlangsyne24.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/response/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:41:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kmiddleton</title>
		<link>http://auldlangsyne24.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/response/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>kmiddleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://auldlangsyne24.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Oooh, Eric.  I hope my last comment didn&#039;t sound like a challenge that would necessitate a whole different argument.  On the whole, I&#039;m trying to get us, as a class, to get as articulate as we can about our own attachments to the book, as well as our suspicions about new technologies/media.  

So, what you&#039;re adding here is useful to us all, I think.  You&#039;re talking about an archive of experience and memory that we access as readers, that invest books themselves with meaning and gravitas and nostalgia (don&#039;t let me put words in your mouth if these are wrong!).  Arjun Appadurai has an article called &quot;the social life of things&quot; and in it, if I remember correctly, he describes the ways in which objects gather value unto themselves, and it sounds like you&#039;re right there with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, Eric.  I hope my last comment didn&#8217;t sound like a challenge that would necessitate a whole different argument.  On the whole, I&#8217;m trying to get us, as a class, to get as articulate as we can about our own attachments to the book, as well as our suspicions about new technologies/media.  </p>
<p>So, what you&#8217;re adding here is useful to us all, I think.  You&#8217;re talking about an archive of experience and memory that we access as readers, that invest books themselves with meaning and gravitas and nostalgia (don&#8217;t let me put words in your mouth if these are wrong!).  Arjun Appadurai has an article called &#8220;the social life of things&#8221; and in it, if I remember correctly, he describes the ways in which objects gather value unto themselves, and it sounds like you&#8217;re right there with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
